Feb 3/08: RAV Ravaged Cambie Street Merchants Fight Back With "Shock and Owe" Campaign ...
A “shock and owe” campaign on Cambie. That’s what retailer Susan
Heyes calls the rapid transit project in her neighbourhood, which
began in August of 2005. She also calls it “Nightmare on Cambie
Street,” a “… years-in-the making production, shot in glorious P3D,
featuring 24-hour surround sound, a totally improvised screenplay,
groundbreaking non-stop action and explosive performances by some of
the industry’s biggest players, with the largest budget ever
recorded.”
Heyes sits in her Quebec street workspace, surrounded by controlled
chaos: fabric rolls, dress designs, stacks of CDs and a corkboard
festooned with newspaper clippings. Her daughter’s colourful drawings
and paintings decorate the walls. Heyes, the 50-year-old owner and
operator of Hazel and Co., a Cambie retail outlet for maternity wear
and women’s clothing, has found her free time has all but evaporated,
ever since a massive public works program hit her retail area and
livelihood.
The $2-billion-and-counting Canada Line project – formerly known as
the Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Line (RAV Line) – is a rapid transit
system under construction to connect the city with Richmond and the
Vancouver International Airport. The 19-kilometre line is the biggest
transportation infrastructure project in BC’s history.
P3 contractor SNC-Lavalin Inc. is building the line and, once
complete, will operate it for 35 years. And although the costs are not
factored into the 2010 Vancouver Olympic budget, the project is part
and parcel of the pre-Games infrastructure blitz now hitting the Lower
Mainland.
Throughout the two-year construction, many merchants along the Canada
Line have struggled to survive, faced with drastically reduced sales,
the inevitable result of traffic diverted from the area. A massive
canyon down the middle of Cambie has created what looks like a
post-nuclear film set in the retail area, from 12th to King Edward
Avenue. Businesses all the way to Marine Drive have felt the retail
chill.
Heyes believes she and her fellow merchants were sold a bill of goods
on the RAV Line. “They assured the community they would bore a tunnel
under the street, and the construction would be two to three months in
front of any given business. It’s been over two years.”
The maternity clothing retailer is now leading the litigation charge
against the City of Vancouver, the Greater Vancouver Transportation
Authority, RAV project management, Intransit BC and Translink. In
November of last year, the project’s attorneys failed to quash her
case for financial compensation.
“My sales dropped instantly 30 percent in November 2005,” Heyes
recalls in her Quebec street workspace. “I was so scared. At the time,
I had been doing this for 22 years, and now I’m in jeopardy of having
everything being dragged down because of this.”
Heyes says she’s lost $500,000 in business since the project began and
has had to mortgage her home twice in two years. She cannot afford to
lose this fight, being on the line for the legal costs if her court
case fails.
She’s not alone in her battle. The Cambie Village Business
Association, which has pretty much ignored the concerns of Heyes and
others throughout this debacle, will launch a group action lawsuit
this month, claiming property owners and businesses have suffered
losses from the transit project.
Leonard Schein, a board member of the Cambie Village Business
Association, says about 60 businesses along the street have either
closed or are on the brink of collapse. Some of those storefronts have
turned over three times, Heyes notes. “A new business comes in - they
fail, and then someone else comes in.”
Linda Liu, owner of Cambie Street’s Aurora Gallery, told Common
Ground, “[The] construction has almost taken everything from us, not
only personal savings, RSSP investment… but also happiness,
healthiness... We have been cheated by Canada Line for two years, and
we have been ignored by government for two years.” Her disgust and
dismay are echoed by other merchants along the line, such as Dale
Dubberly, owner of Thai Away Home restaurant, who says he is
“personally appalled and flabbergasted that the government, whose job
it is to act in the best interest of small businesses as well as the
community at large, would be my biggest financial challenge.”
Heyes and other merchants are outraged that the Canada Line project
through Cambie Village ended up as an open-air, cut-and-cover
operation, when everyone expected a less invasive, underground
tunnel-boring project. It was “no surprise” that it was proposed as
the latter, Heyes says, but it was a huge surprise to everyone else
when it turned into something much more disruptive.
“A cut-and-cover through the Cambie Village would never have been
publicly approved. It was absolutely clear it was a bored tunnel... so
that’s what we based our business decisions on; that’s why I signed a
five-year lease, because I was told it was going to be bored, and the
road surface in front of us wasn’t going to be torn up. The council
briefing notes absolutely outlined how destructive that method of
construction would be in such a narrow and residential retail
corridor. And for that reason, cut-and-cover was not considered for
the Cambie Village.”
Heyes argues that technical briefing documents, provided to City
Council as the basis for its decision to approve the project, drafted
in early spring 2003, prove her case. “They’ve been taken off the City
website for obvious reasons.” The following text appears on page 8 of
Appendix B. RAV Proposal – Cambie Corridor Land Use and Compatibility
City of Vancouver: “All of the RAV options propose a bored tunnel
under Cambie Street between 8th Avenue and King Edward, and in some
options further south, due to the traffic and land use difficulties
associated with other alignment types.”
Last fall, the Vancouver Board of Trade joined the Canada Line to
promote “Lunch on the Line,” a public relations campaign to encourage
the city’s business community to dine at restaurants along the
cash-strapped street. “It’s much more than lunch that we have on the
line,” Heyes notes. For her and her fellow merchants, condescending PR
schemes and mottos like “Cambie is open and waiting for you,” are just
semantic ribbons on an empty package.
Yet there have been some positive responses to the merchants’
troubles. Vancouver Board of Trade chair Henry Lee recently suggested
that three cents a trip on the new line could cover merchants’
compensation for the Canada Line disruption.
It’s not as if Heyes’ request for compensation is unusual, or even
unprecedented. A similar situation prevailed in 1987, after
construction of the Expo SkyTrain line caused disruption in Vancouver
neighbourhoods. Property owners considered taking legal action, but
were saved the bother when the City of Vancouver launched its own
action against the province, reasoning that homeowners should have to
go to court to force the government to provide compensation. The mayor
at the time: Gordon Campbell.
Last November, Heyes upped her visibility in the Cambie campaign with
some impromptu media monkey-wrenching. She heard an announcement on
her car radio for a Canada Line ribbon-cutting ceremony at Cambie and
39th. She called the station, and learned the event was taking place
in 15 minutes. Luckily, Heyes was nearby and she had poster board and
a sharpie in the back of her car. She drove up to the event, scribbled
away in her car, and rolled up her protest signs under her raincoat.
As RAV CEO Jane Bird announced the reopening of a section of Cambie,
Heyes unveiled her sign, which read “Compensation Now! Too Little, Too
Late” and “Our rights are being paved over.” The TV cameras swung over
to Heyes, and she made the national news. “I had my own little press
conference afterwards,” she says, with a note of pride.
For Heyes, ironies and absurdities abound on Vancouver’s transit mega
project. She recently discovered Canada is a world leader in the
building of tunnel-boring machines. Toronto-based Lovat Inc.
manufactures massive, electronically controlled cylinders with
rotating steel and carbide teeth. These monsters dig passageways for
subways, sewers and cables, and they are shipped to worksites as far
as Russia, Turkey and China. According to the Globe and Mail, one of
Lovat’s tunnelling machines is now operating just a short distance
from Vancouver, but not in Canada.
“They sent a machine to Seattle,” Heyes says with laughter, bitterly
amused that one of Canada’s premier technologies is being used south
of the border, but not along Cambie.
In fact, construction of a light rail line is underway on a 14-mile
route from downtown Seattle to Tukwila, with completion scheduled for
mid-2009. Unlike Vancouver, Seattle has made efforts to soften the
blow of disrupted traffic to local businesses, with plenty of
consultation and recommendations back and forth with local property
owners and small business operators, including relocation costs for
affected businesses. According to the Beacon Hill News, $7.5 million
in mitigation funds were set aside to aid local businesses through
loans. The initiative is succeeding.
Heyes is outraged that American small business owners were accorded
more representative democracy than their Canadian counterparts. “This
is the part that I find really unconscionable. They know how
destructive this project would be; they didn’t take any preventative
measures for the businesses that were previously well established...
they basically just let these poor families die, just let their
businesses wither away.”
The Canada Line will obviously be an enduring piece of infrastructure
for Vancouver, for years beyond 2010. Yet many retailers in the path
of our Olympic infrastructure developments, along with the residents
of the Downtown East Side and people living near Eagleridge Bluffs,
suspect the big-money, redevelopment tail is wagging the 2010 dog.
Host city status certainly frees up local governments and developers
for enormous capital construction schemes, with ever-expanding
budgets. This can include the gentrification of entire neighbourhoods,
with the inevitable displacement of long-term residents. The
privatization of profit is followed by the socialization of debt. In
the long run, everyone pays, as was the case with the Montreal
Olympics in ‘72, when the city was left with a billion dollar bill
that it only recently paid off.
For Heyes, it all sounds like a variation of “disaster capitalism,” as
theorized by journalist Naomi Klein in her book The Shock Doctrine.
Disaster capitalism isn’t limited to Anglo-American nations. Red
China, in its WTO-endorsed, corporate-friendly incarnation, is also
getting into the spirit. The Olympic spirit, that is. The Vancouver
Sun recently summed up the preparations on the other side of the world
for the 2008 Games with the headline: “The New Beijing: Entire city
blocks are bulldozed, yet few of the estimated 1.5 million people
displaced appear to be complaining.”
According to the Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions,
at least 1.25 million people have been displaced since April 2007.
Unknown numbers of people have been evicted forcibly, though many
people are reportedly being given financial compensation and a chance
at a new, modern apartment further on Beijing’s outskirts. The
Vancouver Sun report also notes that Chinese citizens lack property
rights, and judges are often corrupted by party officials and
developers. “There have been complaints of violent evictions by thugs
or construction crews injuring or even killing occupants during a
demolition.”
Red China’s approach to non-democratic development seems to whet the
appetite of our public leaders. Consider the words of BC’s transport
minister Kevin Falcon. According to Public Eye Online, in May of 2006,
the Surrey-Cloverdale MLA gave a speech to the Lower Mainland
Municipal Association’s annual general meeting, where he spoke about a
bridge built to connect Mainland China to a new, island-based,
deep-water port.
In his speech, Falcon stated, “No one there ever questions the need to
build infrastructure like this. Now, granted, China has a bit of a
different governance structure. But, in many ways, it is the ideal
governance structure.” The room reportedly broke into laughter at
Falcon’s remark. The transport minister added, “China really has the
ultimate Kevin Falcon government structure,” which produced even more
laughter from the audience. He went on to say that the Chinese “...
don’t have the labour or environmental restrictions we do. It’s not
like they have to do community consultations. They just say ‘we’re
building a bridge’ and they move everyone out of there and get going
within two weeks. Could you imagine if we could build like that?”
Ha ha ha, imagine that. Stop it, Kevin, you’re killing us.
Another telling item involves Vancouver’s 2010 Countdown Clock,
located downtown across from the Vancouver Art Gallery. This
wedge-like, metal and plexiglass construction stands more than six
metres high and three metres wide and weighs over 2,600 pounds. It
resembles something designed in the ‘70s by bell bottom-wearing
futurists. It’s easy to imagine it as an upright sarcophagus for Dr.
Evil, or something excreted by a 300-foot, Fisher-Price robot. There’s
something totalitarian-looking about this blocky timepiece, and
there’s good reason for that. It’s virtually the same clock as the one
in Tiananmen Square in Beijing.
As reported last February in the Georgia Straight, VANOC chairman John
Furlong explained the genesis of Vancouver’s countdown clock in a
speech at a Board of Trade-organized luncheon. “We were in Beijing a
few years ago for a debriefing,” Furlong told the audience. “We took a
walk to Tiananmen Square and we saw the countdown clock in Tiananmen
Square, which is beautiful. So we pulled out our cell phones and we
phoned back to Vancouver, photographed it [the clock] – I don’t even
know if you’re allowed – and we sent it back to Vancouver and said,
‘We have to get ourselves one of these.’ And today we have it, and
it’s very special.”
Tiananmen Square’s troubling past, involving a democratic uprising and
its violent repression, appear to have been utterly lost on Furlong
and his Olympic pals. Decades ago, Red China was demonized in the West
for its human rights violations, which carry on in full force today.
Yet ever since Red China became a card-carrying member of the WTO, and
valued supplier to the US consumer market, any ethical concerns beyond
poisoned pet food and toxic children’s’ toys are considered almost
laughably irrelevant.
Whether it’s East or West, wherever you find politicking, privatizing
and profiteering, it all comes down to a struggle by people who are
doing their best to get ahead. “It’s just been a monumental stress,”
says Heyes of her battle for compensation. The level of bullying
within liberal government itself... I think Campbell is a bully,
Falcon a bully.” Is this sense of fighting against bullies something
she’s always had, I ask? Does a sense of injustice come naturally to
her?
“I don’t believe you really know what you are capable of in a certain
situation until you are in it. Yes, I’ve always jumped in to support
the little guy. I’ve had bullying experiences in my life, in one way
or another. Or where there’s been unfairness. I can’t tolerate it, and
in a democracy, we shouldn’t have to tolerate this kind of unfairness
from our government.”
Heyes says she gets phone calls from her neighbours in the street who
are “... just sobbing into the phone,” and she does what she can to
help, funnelling their calls to city councillors, MLAs, the City
engineering department, and whoever will listen.
“It’s the same sort of thing you do with your children. If my daughter
were being bullied in this way, I’d want to see justice done, I would
want to bring the parties together and mediate. It isn’t a matter of
protesting just to be radical. It’s that this particular issue has an
easy fix: compensation. The fact that they’ve done nothing is really
unconscionable. They are just attacking people who are tax paying
citizens; all of us have paid our dues. You know, we’ve started small
businesses; we’re the very thing that this province wants to celebrate
and they’re shooting us down.
“They brought this disaster to our doors. They are capitalizing on it.
They refused to factor financial relief into the project for the well
known impacts of choosing to build this the way they have. This is not
what should happen in a democracy.”
Heyes still seems remarkably upbeat, given the battle she’s chosen, or
that has chosen her. She, and perhaps many others, will have their day
in court this year. As for the ongoing sacrifices to our pending
Olympic peak experience – an image comes to mind of bodies thrown into
a volcano – we can’t just wait for the judgment of history.
“Compensation is the right thing to do,” Heyes insists. |